Compare with Competitor

See exactly how your website stacks up against a competitor's — SEO, performance, and technical setup, side by side.

Overview

What is the Compare Websites tool?

Compare Websites is a free tool that runs SEOJuicer's full audit — the same SEO, performance, and technical checks used in a standalone site audit — on two URLs at once, then lines the results up side by side. Every metric, from overall score down to individual checks like load time, internal link count, and images missing alt text, gets a clear winner marked wherever a genuinely better direction exists, plus an overall verdict for each site.

It exists because a single audit tells you what's wrong with a page, but it doesn't tell you how that stacks up against the competition you're actually trying to beat in search results. Whether you're pitching a redesign, sizing up a competitor before a content push, or just curious how your site compares against the market leader in your space, running both sites through the same checks at the same time gives you a genuinely comparable, apples-to-apples answer instead of two separate reports you have to reconcile yourself.

Guide

How to use this tool

No signup, no install — enter two URLs and see exactly who's ahead on every metric.

Step 01

Enter both websites

Add your website and a competitor's — any live URL works.

Step 02

We audit both, side by side

The same SEO, performance, and technical checks run on each site at once.

Step 03

See who wins each metric

Every row is marked with a clear winner, plus an overall score for each site.

Methodology

How this data is collected

When you submit two URLs, the tool checks each site's own audit cache first — a recently audited site is used as-is, while an uncached one runs a fresh scan across every SEO, performance, and technical module SEOJuicer's full audit uses. Both sites' fresh scans run genuinely in parallel through a shared concurrency limit, so the comparison completes in roughly the time a single full audit would take rather than twice as long. Each metric row is then calculated the same way it would be on a standalone audit report, and a winner is marked wherever the metric has a clear better direction — a higher score, a faster load time, fewer missing alt tags.

Metrics without an objectively better direction, like external link count, are shown for both sites without a forced winner, since more or fewer isn't inherently good or bad without more context. Results reflect each site's live HTML, headers, and response at the moment the comparison runs; results are also cached briefly per site so a repeat comparison involving a recently checked domain returns faster on subsequent runs.

Tips

Best practices for reading a comparison

A few habits worth keeping before you act on what a comparison turns up.

  • Use it before a redesign, not just after a launch. Comparing your current site against a competitor's is a fast way to spot exactly what's holding your rankings back before you commit to a rebuild.
  • Pay close attention to performance differences. Load time and page size differences of even a second can noticeably affect bounce rate and conversions, often more than a small SEO score gap does.
  • Don't chase a single winning row in isolation. A category leader is calculated from several metrics together, so treat individual row wins as data points rather than the whole verdict on a category.
  • Re-run the comparison after making changes. Since every check runs live, a comparison from before a fix won't reflect it — re-comparing confirms whether the change actually closed the gap.
FAQs

Frequently asked questions

Have questions about comparing websites? Here are the most common ones our users ask before getting started.

Want the full picture, not just a comparison?

Run a comprehensive audit and get actionable insights to improve your rankings.

Run Free Website Audit